On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Ayers, Mike wrote: > This, however, is absurd - one of those 1,000,000 words is > "antidisestablishmentarianism", and there's a whole bunch half that long or > longer. Show me the glyphs for them! This NEC thingy may make cute artsy > stuff, but it would be useless for communication. Besides, does anyone > really believe that alphabetic writers would decide that they'd rather learn > thousands of glyphs? We're getting deeply fictional here... Not to mention the controversy there'd be about unifying the glyphs for "colour/color" etc. ;-) -- Daniel Biddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Kenneth Whistler
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Curtis Clark
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- Re: fictional scripts revisited John H. Jenkins
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Ayers, Mike
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Daniel Biddle
- Re: fictional scripts revisited David Starner
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Curtis Clark
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Christopher John Fynn
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Michael Everson
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable

