Joel Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: ... > Maybe I'm a crackpot, but the need is there and people will use and abuse > UNICODE in ways that you probably don't want to imagine. What I'm trying to > push is building the mechanism now for dodging most of the abuse. ... Well the PUA areas are always there - pretty much for people to use and abuse almost any way they can imagine. You could always create and maintain another PUA registry along the lines of ConScript - but for idiosyncratic characters etc which fall outside the scope of that registry. - Chris
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- Re: fictional scripts revisited John H. Jenkins
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Ayers, Mike
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Daniel Biddle
- Re: fictional scripts revisited David Starner
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Curtis Clark
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Christopher John Fynn
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Michael Everson
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable