At 08:33 -0800 2001-02-27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This has always puzzled me, because Cyrillic includes lots of other >characters that transliterate to two or more Latin letters. CH, SH, SHCH, >and ZH leap to mind; there may be more. What was the thought process behind >providing these compatibility characters only for the Serbo-Croatian >additions to Cyrillic, but not for the other Cyrillic characters? It was politically motivated, to satisfy a voting NB. -- Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie 15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland Mob +353 86 807 9169 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Vox +353 1 478 2597 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire
- Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) DougEwell2
- RE: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Rick McGowan
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... John Cowan
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Michael Everson
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... John Cowan
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Frank da Cruz
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Frank da Cruz
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... DougEwell2
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Lukas Pietsch
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... J%ORG KNAPPEN
- RE: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... G. Adam Stanislav

