On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This has always puzzled me, because Cyrillic includes lots of other > characters that transliterate to two or more Latin letters. CH, SH, SHCH, > and ZH leap to mind; These are *English* translitterations. In the *Russian* translitteration SHCH is a digraph, the other characters you mention are single letters (C, S, Z, with hacek). Germans transliterate a single cyrillic letter with TSCH, shouldn't Unicode have also this tetragraph encoded? (ducking...) P.
- Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) DougEwell2
- RE: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Rick McGowan
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... John Cowan
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Michael Everson
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... John Cowan
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Frank da Cruz
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Frank da Cruz
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... DougEwell2
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Lukas Pietsch
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... J%ORG KNAPPEN
- RE: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon sil... Erland Sommarskog

