Tex Texin scripsit:
> I would rather say simply that Unicode is the only character set
> that exists for certain markets. I believe this is true, but
> would like to have at least a few examples of scripts or
> languages that have no other code pages but Unicode.
> I have in mind Inuktitut and perhaps Byzantine music, but its
> a bit hard to establish that there are no other code pages.
Oh sure. The point is that ISCII does exist, but Microsoft does not
support it: therefore, if you are going to do Indic languages,
you must have Unicode (for Microsoft environments, anyway).
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode DougEwell2
- RE: benefits of unicode Marco Cimarosti
- RE: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael Everson
- Re: benefits of unicode John Cowan
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: benefits of unicode Yves Arrouye
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan

