From: "Tex Texin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The fact that a product supports Unicode and does not support another > code > page used in some region, does not mean that the vendor > supports that region, nor does it mean if they decide to support the > region that it would be only with Unicode... It DOES, however, underscore the fact that Unicode support is so much easier than supporting every random code page that the only reasonable way vendors can keep up with every single market is to have a good story for Unicode support. Certainly if there is no business case for a company like Microsoft or IBM or Progress (<g>) to support a particular non-standard code page, but then Unicode supports the script, then suddenly there is an avenue to support the script, right? michka
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael Everson
- Re: benefits of unicode John Cowan
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: benefits of unicode Yves Arrouye
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham
- Re: benefits of unicode James Kass
- Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham
- Re: benefits of unicode Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin

