From: "John Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Oh sure. The point is that ISCII does exist, but Microsoft does not > support it: therefore, if you are going to do Indic languages, > you must have Unicode (for Microsoft environments, anyway). Actually, this is not really true... Windows 2000 and XP both have the ISCII code pages available. They are just not things you can set as default system code pages. But if you are converting data from other sources, these code pages can be very useful. Their implementation is also a bit faster than the one I wrote back in early 1999 (if that matters to you, it did to me at the time since I was sure I had optimized it as much as possible!). MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. http://www.trigeminal.com/
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode DougEwell2
- RE: benefits of unicode Marco Cimarosti
- RE: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael Everson
- Re: benefits of unicode John Cowan
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: benefits of unicode Yves Arrouye
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham

