Doug Ewell quoted:
>"By convention, the Private Use Area is divided into a Corporate Use subarea,
>starting at U+F8FF and extending downward in values, and an End User subarea,
>starting at U+E000 and extending upward."
Then Michael Everson wrote:
> This has nothing to do with ISO/IEC 10646.
> Who decides who is corporate?
The original intent was that if you think you're writing "platform"
software, you could consider starting at the top of the "Corporate Use
subarea"; and if you think you're an "end user" you could consider starting
at the bottom of the "End User subarea". This would give a way for
platforms to sort of avoid colliding with real end-user codepoints.
But of course, as Michael points out:
> all users are free to use any position in the PUA
Rick
- On the possibility of guidance code points for the Priv... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Michael Everson
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... DougEwell2
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Michael Everson
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Rick McGowan
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Eric Muller
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Timothy Partridge
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Kenneth Whistler
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... William Overington
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Marco Cimarosti

