On 04/24/2001 06:50:00 AM Tim Partridge wrote: >> Effectively, you're still dependent upon individual agreement between users >> as to the meaning of PUA codepoints. > >A good point. A possible workaround would be a new plane-14 tag character. Gack!!! [Just offering my initial reaction. I'm not suggesting this is an argument for or against... :-) ] - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- On the possibility of guidance code points for the Priv... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Michael Everson
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... DougEwell2
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Michael Everson
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Rick McGowan
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Eric Muller
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points... Timothy Partridge
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Kenneth Whistler
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... William Overington
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... DougEwell2
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Ayers, Mike
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... William Overington

