Tim Partridge wrote: > A good point. A possible workaround would be a new plane-14 > tag character. Sorry, I received this only after I proposed the same thing. Of course Tim wins the lot, as demonstrated by the e-mails time stamps. > But as Ken points out the world isn't complex enough yet to need a > standardised way of describing how you're being non-standard. Well, using the PUA is not really non-standard. It is Unicode's *standard* way to encode private characters. And, BTW, the world is quite complex to me, although I constantly get evidence that it is easier for others :-( gotta have my IQ checked up :-) _ Marco
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Eric Muller
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for... Timothy Partridge
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Kenneth Whistler
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... William Overington
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... DougEwell2
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Ayers, Mike
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... William Overington
- RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Ayers, Mike
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... Peter_Constable
- Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the ... William Overington

