>The Unicode 3.0 book does not have sake under water plus 7 strokes. > >Sake IS water with 7 strokes more, isn't it? No, it's "wine" with three additional strokes. This how it's classified in the KangXi dictionary. Since it's Morohashi index is one more than the index of a character which undoubtedly has the "wine" radical, that would appear to be how Morohashi indexes it, too. (I don't have a copy of Morohashi at home to look at.) >Has this been corrected in 3.1? Doesn't have to be; nothing to correct. It is on occasion something of an art figuring out the correct radical/stroke position for a character in this kind of an index, sad to say. -- ===== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Thomas Chan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael Everson
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book Michael Everson
- FW: Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- How far afield can we go? (was Re: Re: Erra... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Richard Cook
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book James Kass
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book Tom Emerson
- Re: Erratum in Unicode book John H. Jenkins