At 6:05 PM -0700 7/8/01, Richard Cook wrote:
>"John H. Jenkins" wrote:
>>
>>  It is on occasion something of an art figuring out the correct
>>  radical/stroke position for a character in this kind of an index, sad
>>  to say.
>
>I'd say, when 2 radicals are possible, put it under both. When 3, well
>... you probably get the idea ...

In theory, the Unicode RS index already allows for alternate stroke 
counts.  There's no reason why we cannot allow for alternate radicals 
as well.
-- 
=====
John H. Jenkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Reply via email to