> From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > I think that any proposal to shrink the range of well-formed documents > is simply a nonstarter, regrettable as that is. I had thought that one of the main goals of XML Blueberry was mainframe compatibility. If so, won't they need to disallow the C1 characters which wreak havoc on mainframe terminals? If they can make that change, other relatively minor changes could be made at that time (if ever). That's my thinking, anyway. Should I be crossposting the XML folks on this? /|/|ike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- FW: Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: FW: Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Youtie Effaight
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Andy Heninger
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Martin Duerst
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Tex Texin
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Bill Kurmey
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? John Cowan
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Tex Texin
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? John Cowan
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Martin Duerst

