At 01:11 PM 7/19/01 -0500, Mike Ayers wrote: > The work has to be done somewhere. Emerging technologies must be >compatible with existing ones, and some old technologies hang around a long >time. Really, the disallowing of control characters makes sense, since >their interpretation in so many exisiting protocols is "wreak havoc upon the >unsuspecting". You simply can't send these characters around the internet >and expect them to arrive unchanged. Does anyone have a (list, web site, reference) which lists which C0 and C1 control codes "wreak havoc upon the unsuspecting" and why? Bill Kurmey, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Andy Heninger
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Martin Duerst
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Tex Texin
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Bill Kurmey
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? John Cowan
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Tex Texin
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? John Cowan
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Martin Duerst
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? James Kass

