Tex Texin scripsit:
> Which seemed to me to rule out the NCR for > in situations other
> than "]]>" for compatibility reasons.
>
> "If they are needed elsewhere, they must be escaped using either
> numeric character references or the strings "&" and "<"
> respectively. The right angle bracket (>) may be represented using
> the string ">", and must, for compatibility, be escaped using
> ">" or a character reference when it appears in the string "]]>"
> in content, when that string is not marking the end of a CDATA
> section."
Naah. Just because it says "may" doesn't mean anything: what "may" be
done, also "may" be not done. You may use a numeric character
reference for any legal character.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Andy Heninger
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Martin Duerst
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Tex Texin
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Bill Kurmey
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Shigemichi Yazawa
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? John Cowan
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Tex Texin
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Mark Davis
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? John Cowan
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Martin Duerst
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? James Kass

