Bernard Miller wrote: > Instead of >.proclaiming Unicode is not to blame, it would be a > good idea for Unicode to provide some character > properties that could help an implementation reduce > spoofing.
What criteria would you use for determining these properties? How would you determine which characters should be identified as "spoof buddies" (after you've gotten the easy cases like Latin/Greek/Cyrillic A out of the way)? If your answer is "by lookin' at 'em," then my next question will be, "In what font?" -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
