>> - a cross-reference of characters whose associated glyphs could be
>> confused by a non-technical user;
ME> Out of the entire standard? Who's going to do that for free? :-)
I don't know. I'm not lobbying anyone here -- I'm just trying to
clarify why so many of us are finding it difficult to get to grips
with Unicode.
(Were you volunteering? ;-)
>> would rather do something else than working out which characters
>> exactly can appear in a Coptic context.
ME> Yes, and I'm interested in that sort of task.
I realise that -- and I'm extremely grateful. Not being aware of the
Scripts file, I thought that working out this information required
converting the relevant EGT PDFs to machine-understandable form -- au
temps pour moi (I stand corrected).
Juliusz
