On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 10:29 AM, David Starner wrote:
> In any case, we aren't talking live languages here. The set of > Chinese and Japanese ideographs in modern use have been encoded. The > characters left are obscure historical ones. > > Would it were so. There are still characters missing for modern non-Mandarin dialects of Chinese; some of the ones Unicode is proposing for CJK Extension C are from Cantonese dictionaries. ========== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
