----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "William Overington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: den 17 mars 2002 01:45 Subject: Re: Synthetic scripts
> The closest I can come is something like "a script that was invented, > generally by one person and in a relatively short period of time, rather > than evolving from existing scripts in a gradual and progressive > manner." > > But right away that definition includes not only Shavian, Tengwar, > Cirth, Klingon, and most of the contents of ConScript, but also > Ethiopic, Cherokee, Canadian Syllabics, Gothic, Deseret, and maybe Yi > Syllabics, all of which are already encoded in Unicode. Wouldn't this also include Italian? Maybe I should propose exclusion of all characters used in Italian scripts... ;) Stefan _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
