John, Stefan, y Mikka-Markus escribieron: >>> Can you prove that this doesn't apply to any of the scripts already in >>> the Standard? No, you can't, as it is not known under which >>> circumstances Latin, Greek, Kanji, etc., were created. >> >> Come, come. It is perfectly clear that Latin script was designed to >> represent Latin, Greek script to represent Greek, and Kanji to represent >> Old Chinese. > > Prove it! > (And prove that those languages weren't designed for some kind of > litterature or similar...)
Not necessary. I consider my point well proven, that the distinction between "real" and "artificial" scripts is at best controversial, and possibly non-existent. Given that, plus the fact that several scripts which could plausibly be called "artificial" are already in Unicode, in both the BMP and the SMP, I would suggest that it would be neither advisable nor possible to banish so-called "artificial" or "synthetic" scripts to their own plane, as William Overington suggested. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
