Mark Leisher scripsit: > Herr Krojer takes Illig, and by extension, Niemitz to task quite effectively, > in my opinion.
I fed this through babelfish, and the principal argument seems to be that we can correlate very nicely the predicted dates, places, and times of lunar eclipses in ancient times with the testimony we have, so unless that testimony is massively falsified too, the conventional scale has to be correct. -- John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
