On 06/28/2002 11:34:35 PM "Doug Ewell" wrote: ><sigh /> OK, here are the details...
OK, now I know the cha$B?(B of events that he was referr$B?(Bg to, and I'm def$B?(B itely $B?(Bcl$B?(Bed to agree that it was a complete co$B?(Bcidence. It is trivial, $B?(B fact, to disprove the hypothesis that the "experiment" supposedly proved. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
