[I see the encoding in my response got botched -- trying again.]
On 06/29/2002 08:34:44 PM "John H. Jenkins" wrote: >> OK, now I know the cha of events that he was referrg to, and I'm def >> itely cled to agree that it was complete cocidence. It is trivial, >> fact, to disprove the hypothesis that the "experiment" supposedly proved. >> >> > >Will you guys *please* stop sending me email with the Shavian letter >CHURCH everywhere the Latin letters "ct" should be? It's most distracting. > :-) John, please don't assume that I use private-use codepoints the same way someone else does without first verifying. My document contained neither a Latin ligature "ct" not Shavian letter CHURCH, but rather my most delightful LATIN LIGATURE IN WITH SWASH SERIF AND TAIL. ;-) - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
