On 06/29/2002 08:34:44 PM "John H. Jenkins" wrote: >> OK, now I know the cha$B?(B of events that he was referr$B?(Bg to, and I'm >def$B?(B >> itely $B?(Bcl$B?(Bed to agree that it was complete co$B?(Bcidence. It is >trivial, $B?(B >> fact, to disprove the hypothesis that the "experiment" supposedly proved. >> >> > >Will you guys *please* stop sending me email with the Shavian letter >CHURCH everywhere the Latin letters "ct" should be? It's most distracting. > :-)
John: Will you please be careful not to assume that my use of a certain codepoint is the same as someone else's. My document contained neither a substitute for Latin letters "ct" nor your Shavian letter CHURCH, but my most delightful LATIN LIGATURE IN WITH SWASH SERIFS AND TAILS. ;-) - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
