----- Message d'origine ----- De: "David Possin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am wondering if the statement on that web page "gh=German ich-laut" > is applicable. Wouldn't Dutch "gh"-laut make more sense, like in "van > Gogh"? Could you explain how the Dutch "gh"-laut is different from the native Dutch "g"-laut. Isn't the "gh" in Van Gogh simply an older or a regional form ? (XVIth century writes, for instance, eyghenschap or Nederlansche Spellijnghe (1550, first book in Dutch on its spelling from Joos Lambrecht)). P. Andries - o - o - o - o Unicode en fran�ais (texte annot�, noms de tous les caract�res Unicode 3.2) http://hapax.iquebec.com
