Michael Everson wrote: > What the encoding of a set of brDa rTen precomposed syllables would > do would be to restrict the Tibetans to this set, to which they have > been restricted by the proprietary Founder software used in China. > These 950 syllables are insufficient to express anything but > newspaper and bureaucratic Tibetan.
I totally agree. My point was another: if it is true that there is a large existing corpus encoded in that encoding, a prerequisite to reject the proposal is demonstrating that the path to Unicode is be smooth, with no risk for the data and no unsustainable costs. _ Marco
