At 01:25 PM 12/17/2002, Carl W. Brown wrote:
With which other languages? Not Yi, or the languages that use the Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics.Michael,> >I was disappointed that Unicode used precomposed encoding for Ethiopic. > > Heavens, why? I assume that you are being tongue-in-cheek. If not: Since you key in syllables as consonant+vowel combinations you can keep the encoding under 256 characters like most other languages with syllabic glyphs and keep the processing consistent with other languages.
The processing model for scripts in Unicode tends to follow fairly closely the nature of the scripts as traditionally understood. The Tibetan script, like Korean Hangul and also like the Indic scripts from which it derives, is generative: syllables are built by the manipulation, substitution and positioning of sub-syllabic units. This is inherent in the design of these scripts.
The Ethiopic script is *not* made up of sub-syllabic units: the syllable is the minimum unit of writing. The same is true to Yi and the Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics. The fact that Ethiopic has recently been input phonetically should not lead to confusion about the inherent nature of the script, which is not generative.
John Hudson
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A book is a visitor whose visits may be rare,
or frequent, or so continual that it haunts you
like your shadow and becomes a part of you.
- al-Jahiz, The Book of Animals
