Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)

[Rick McGowan]

Since nobody else is saying anything even semi-official, let me 
inject... As we move through this discussion of snazziness and visual 
aspects of the "Unicode Savvy" logo, people should keep a couple of 
things in mind:

1. UTC has not grappled with what "compliant" means, and unless/until 
that happens, you're not going to see that word used in conjunction with 
any logo or stamp of approval. You can also rule out "conformant".

2. It is unikely that the Unicode *logo* itself (i.e. the thing at 
http://www.unicode.org/webscripts/logo60s2.gif) will be incorporated 
directly in any image that people are allowed to put on their websites, 
because to put the Unicode logo on a product or whatever requires a 
license agreement. I.e. the submissions from E. Trager are out of scope 
because they contain the Unicode logo on the left side.

Those are just some things to keep in mind...

	Rick