Philippe Verdy schreef: > Interesting issue for the Latin Small "ij" Ligature (U+0133): > Normally the Soft_Dotted issupposed to make disappear one dot when > there's and additional diacritic above, but many applications may > keep these two dots above, fitting the diacritic in the middle. > > This proposal would mean that this become illegal, and it promote the > use of an additional intermediate dot-above diacritic if the dot must > be kept.
I don't know of any instances where a ij digraph would keep the dots AND get additional accent marks, nor of any where the ij would appear with a dotless i and dotless j and a single dot above, centered between them. Can you give examples? Pim Blokland
