At 13:01 -0700 2003-07-30, Peter Kirk wrote:
On 30/07/2003 12:07, John Cowan wrote:
See the reference glyph for U+FB4B. One form looks like this with the dot above further to the left, the other like it with the dot a little further to the right. This glyph with the centred dot is a compromise between the two.
When you say "it", which glyph do you mean? I would like a description of what the two glyphs look like and how they are to be distinguished, please.
A picture speaks a thousand words.
Two thousand words for you. The two glyphs from Ezra SIL, and a scan from BHS showing the two glyphs in context.
-- Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
<<inline: Gen 4-13 holam vav and vav holam.bmp>>
<<inline: Two vavs with holam.bmp>>
