Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8

[YTang0648]

In a message dated 11/4/2003 8:48:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Serious answer: It should recognize that the text is *ill-formed* UTF-8 (definition D30) and should probably decline to process the two code points.  Agree If it wants to be more charitable than conformant, it MAY choose to reassemble them to create U+10300, but it is under no obligation to do so. hum... where is that part part come from. I though Unicode 3.2 and 4.0 is clear that seqnece is illegal. I don't think "it MAY choose to erassemble them to create U+10300" is in the Unicode standard. Actually, if you do so, it may create security hole in the application.   ================================== Frank Yung-Fong Tang System Architect, I�t�rn�ti�n�l D�v�l�pme�t, AOL Int�r��t�v� S�rvi�es AIM:yungfongta mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:650-937-2913 Yahoo! Msg: frankyungfongtan John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. Does your software display Thai language text correctly for Thailand users? -> Basic Conceptof Thai Language linked from Frank Tang's I�t�rn�ti�n�liz�ti�n Secrets Want to translate your English text to something Thailand users can understand ? -> Try English-to-Thai machine translation at http://c3po.links.nectec.or.th/parsit/