|
In a message dated 11/4/2003 9:57:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote: I agree with you even new software could only support just BMP. But that only mean we need to bring those software forward, instead bring the specification backward.
Then, it is a very good news for you! Log a bug against it and request it be a beta stopper. And that is probably exactly why "this is still in alpha". Anyone want to look at their code and submit a patch? Anyone can point out where is the current code which did that ?
Buggy software are created everyday.
At the risk of upsetting the open-source faithful, that is just plain I don't think you shoudl call it "lazy". It is just "under construction" if such software is still in "alpha". How many software have such support in their "Alpha" stage in your company ?
Anyone who can master the wizardly details of building a powerful ==================================
Frank Yung-Fong Tang System Architect, I�t�rn�ti�n�l D�v�l�pme�t, AOL Int�r��t�v� S�rvi�es AIM:yungfongta mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:650-937-2913 Yahoo! Msg: frankyungfongtan John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. Does your software display Thai language text correctly for Thailand users? -> Basic Conceptof Thai Language linked from Frank Tang's I�t�rn�ti�n�liz�ti�n Secrets Want to translate your English text to something Thailand users can understand ? -> Try English-to-Thai machine translation at http://c3po.links.nectec.or.th/parsit/ |
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Philippe Verdy
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Jungshik Shin
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Peter Kirk
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Philippe Verdy
- Ill-formed sequences (was: Re: UTF-16 inside UT... Doug Ewell
- RE: Ill-formed sequences (was: Re: UTF-16 i... Addison Phillips [wM]
- Re: Ill-formed sequences (was: Re: UTF-... Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Peter Kirk
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Philippe Verdy
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Philippe Verdy
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Philippe Verdy

