So, if Masonic Samaritan script texts (no intention of secrecy there, by the way) should be encoded as a cipher of Latin and not with the Unicode Samaritan script, does that imply that Azerbaijani Latin texts should be encoded as a cipher or Azerbaijani Cyrillic and not with Unicode Latin?
Michael didn't say that Masonic use of Samaritan should be encoded as a cipher of Latin. I suspect he cares as little about how Masons encode their texts as I do. They will have the choice, in future, whether to encode Samaritan as a cipher of Latin or as actual Samaritan characters. This is irrelevant to Unicode.
John Hudson
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Vancouver, BC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sometimes think that good readers are as singular,
and as awesome, as great authors themselves.
- JL Borges
