Tibetan experts requested that yung-drung-chi-khor and yung-drung-nang-khor be added to the standard. Some people insisted that they be unified with the CJK clones. I don't personally think that this is a particularly good idea. It has ramifications for font binding and is, frankly, one of those silly unifications. In other contexts we leave CJK to its own devices. But "symbol squeamishness" on the part of those who preferred the unification won the day at that time, and we were encoding other Tibetan symbols which took precedence.

To respond to Mark Shoulson, one could consider that Hitler's svastika was the logo of the National Socialist Party, and therefore should not be encoded.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com


Reply via email to