> Still it seems legitimate to mark the font explicitly with the private > convention it is supposed to support. For example a font containing glyphs > mapped to PUAs assigned in the 2003 version of the ConScript PUA registry > could > be marked as such by including a trace of this private usage agreement. > Without > it, nothing will indicate explicitly in the font for which characters its > internal PUA bindings were intented.
I think this is not needed. If a font has a trace to its copyright owner then it seems to me reasonable to suppose the copyright owner is the one to consult when difficulties arise about its PUA conventions.
