For what it is worth, I think the casing conventions "mn" vs "MN" vs
"Mong" are useful, and I don't know why software needs to disregard
it. But even if software does have to do so for good reasons, there's
no reason that one can't exercise discipline and always follow the
casing conventions for clarity.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was:ISO 15924... Antoine Leca
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was:ISO 1... Philippe Verdy
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was:ISO 1... John Cowan
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was:I... Antoine Leca
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was:ISO 15924) Doug Ewell
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 15924) Doug Ewell
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 1592... Philippe Verdy
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO ... Michael Everson
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO ... Doug Ewell
- Re: lowercased Unicode language tags ? (was: ISO 1592... Michael Everson

