At 16:21 -0400 2004-06-10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You don't KNOW that. You assert that. This is the "adversarial" styleI was objecting to, John. Could you please take this on board?
Fair enough, Michael. But the burden of going forward with the evidence is still yours. (I'll do what I can.)
I have shown (1) that they exist, (2) that they have specific usage. I have not shown them in a second document, though I have shown that Pullum & Ladusaw have quoted one word in Doke's orthography, spelling it with his peculiar use of diacritics. I would be happy to find a second use of the letters, but I consider the usefulness of being able to cite Doke in the original to be perfectly legitimate. Let's see what turns up in NYPL and LOC.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
