> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Asmus Freytag
> As a matter of basic parity, I just don't > see why we take such great pains to standardize extremely rare forms of Han > ideographs, but baulk at supporting our own writing system and its > extensions equally faithfully. Point taken. > That doesn't mean that we stop asking all the hard questions, but that we > allow a presumption of usefulness for characters that were in demonstrated > use over some time and by several authors. But it is precisely that status that is called into question here. Unless your definition of "several" is '>=1'. Peter Peter Constable Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies Microsoft Windows Division
