On Fri, 6 Aug 2010  Joó Ádám <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nevertheless, our typesetter had those types for some reason. Or do
> you think that – given its different style – it was only a glyph
> variant of some other font?

That's what André suggested and it might be true.

Looks like nobody was interested in this question before so I have to
make my own investigations :-) I've located only one book prepared by
the same typesetter, but it seems it does not contain any form of the
section sign.

Best regards

Janusz

-- 
                     ,   
dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW -  Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki 
Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bien - Warsaw University (Department of Formal Linguistics)
[email protected], [email protected], http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/


Reply via email to