2011/6/28 Michael Everson <[email protected]>: > On 28 Jun 2011, at 09:28, Jean-François Colson wrote: > >> In Times New Roman, which is the default font for MS Word (probably the best >> known word processor), the letters “a” and “ɑ” are indistinguishable in >> italics. > > That is a fault of the font. In Uralic and Germanic linguistics, where both > letters are used in italics, the letter “ɑ” when italicized looks like a > Greek α in the "cross-over knot" style. See page 20 of > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2419.pdf for an example.
Yes, and Times New Roman has other defects when considering rendered widths : - the straight letter 'a' and its italic letter (that looks like an angled 'ɑ') are narrow and both exactly the same width. All seems correct for their widths, with the exception of the letter form for the italic style (which is in fact incorrect for this letter, or at least inconsistant for the font family). - the straight letter 'ɑ' is wide, about 23% wider than straight letter 'a': this is correct; but its italic letter (that looks like an angled 'ɑ') is unexpectedly narrower (and in fact it reuses the same glyph as the narrow italic "a"), so the italic 'ɑ' is also incorrect (it should be about 10% wider). Another behavior occurs when considering the bold weight : - it's OK that all bold straight letters are about 20% larger than non-bold letters, but we still have the distinction between wide and narrow letterforms. - But worse : when using both bold and italic styles, now all letters have the same width than non-bold italic (this affects ALL letters of the alphabet). In other words, character metrics are inconsistant throughout the font family for bold and/or italic styles, instead of the normal style (non-bold non-italic) which is the only one with correct metrics.
