On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:17:20 +0200 Frédéric Grosshans <[email protected]> wrote:
> The text you scanned would then be in plain text (with s and z > inverted) > 49. How are we to decide between s and z in such words as > anatemathiₛᷦe cauteriₛᷦe, criticiₛᷦe, deodoriₛᷦe, dogmatiₛᷦe, > fraterniₛᷦe and the rest ? Many of these are derived from Greek > Since that is possible with current unicode while the original > orthography of Henry Alford's 1888 book is not, I think this an > argument to encode LATIN SUBSCRIPT LATIN Z. Why should the subscript and combining superscript letters be the 'same' size? Richard.
