On 20 March 2014 14:12, "Jörg Knappen" <jknap...@web.de> wrote: > > Who writes a proposal?
I wish that there was a mechanism for encoding CJK characters that allowed individuals to simply submit characters with appropriate evidence to Unicode, and after review they could be added to the next version Unicode, but the reality is that you need to go through a long and bureaucratic process involving the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), with the result that it may take ten years to get a CJK character encoded. Even the Unicode Consortium seems powerless to overcome IRG bureaucracy, as the sorry tale below illustrates. In 2012 I wrote a proposal to encode 226 Han characters, including two fish characters previously requested by Shi Zhao on this list <http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m05/0259.html>, which I submitted to the Unicode Technical Committee (UTC): <http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12333-cjk-f.pdf> The UTC accepted this document, and included the suggested characters in the Unicode submission to the IRG for inclusion in the CJK-F extension: <http://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~irg/irg/irg39/IRGN1888_UTCExtensionF.zip> This was discussed at the IRG meeting in Hanoi in November 2012 (http://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~irg/irg/irg39/IRG39.htm), but the Unicode submission for CJK-F was entirely rejected by IRG just because the submission was a couple of days late. The UTC later submitted a proposal to encode 19 of the original characters (including Shi Zhao's two fish characters) as urgently needed characters: <http://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~irg/irg/irg40/IRGN1936_UTC_UNC.zip> But this was rejected by IRG in November last year as they considered that these characters were not urgent enough, so now we will have to wait another four or five years before they can be considered for CJK-G. Good luck getting the characters for newtonium and nebulium encoded any sooner! Andrew _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode