On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:19:57 -0700 Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> wrote:
> On this side show, Philippe finally is correct, because I received > his message without ASCII-i-fication; he cc'd me directly, and I > never saw the mangled text. It's a bit embarassing for a Unicode mail > list to not even be able to let guillemets through unmolested. Are you sure it's the mail list that did the mangling? As I got the post, it had two parts, plain-text in ISO-8859-1, with '<<' and '>>' substituted for the guillemets '«' and '»', and HTML, also in ISO-8859-1, with character entities « and ». I suspect Philippe's e-mail client may be at fault. Richard. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
