This has seen off-line discussion with the mail manager and we're good.
A./
On 5/1/2014 3:44 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:19:57 -0700
Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> wrote:
On this side show, Philippe finally is correct, because I received
his message without ASCII-i-fication; he cc'd me directly, and I
never saw the mangled text. It's a bit embarassing for a Unicode mail
list to not even be able to let guillemets through unmolested.
Are you sure it's the mail list that did the mangling? As I got the
post, it had two parts, plain-text in ISO-8859-1, with '<<' and '>>'
substituted for the guillemets '«' and '»', and HTML, also in
ISO-8859-1, with character entities « and ». I suspect
Philippe's e-mail client may be at fault.
Richard.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
