On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Jukka K. Korpela <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is there evidence of its use in text? This should be an essential question > when discussing whether it should be defined as a Unicode character. Use as > “logo” or, rather, as a standalone graphic symbol does not really mean it > is used as a character. It is a standalone graphic symbol with a religious and astrological significance. There are a number such symbols in Unicode, for example: U+2626-U+262A, and U+1F540-U+1F54A. My understanding is that such symbols are eligible to be encoded in Unicode, though there are many factors to considered: http://www.unicode.org/pending/symbol-guidelines.html James
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
