|
On 10/16/2015 12:18 AM, Marcel
Schneider wrote:
Unless based on information about the jurisdiction involved and preferably some definite knowledge of its rules, this kind of contribution is worse than useless. The first letter is from an obsolete orthography and the second to last is for phonetic use (it's a small-caps, so Unicode recommends it not being used for ordinary text). For systems that do limit their character repertoire to a "clean" subset, these two would be prime candidates for exclusion. So Leo would be unable to register that name as a top level domain name, for example. A./ |
- Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Canada Denis Jacquerye
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Canada Marcel Schneider
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Canada Leo Broukhis
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Cana... Denis Jacquerye
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Cana... Marcel Schneider
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, ... Asmus Freytag (t)
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Canada Marcel Schneider
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Canada Marcel Schneider
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Canada Marcel Schneider
- RE: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Cana... Erkki I Kolehmainen
- Re: Latin glottal stop in ID in NWT, Canada Marcel Schneider
- Terminology (was: Latin glottal stop in ID in... Richard Wordingham
- Re: Terminology (was: Latin glottal stop ... Marcel Schneider
- Re: Terminology (was: Latin glottal stop ... Marcel Schneider
- Re: Terminology (was: Latin glottal s... Richard Wordingham
- Re: Terminology (was: Latin glot... Eli Zaretskii

