There are three main Unicode technical committees: we use an issue tracker for two of them, but not the UTC (which established its processes earlier). Personally, I'd favor an issue tracker for the UTC as well, but decisions as to the process are determined by the committee. (Note again that nothing said on this list will be taken up by the UTC unless someone submits a proposal to the UTC.)
Mark On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Christoph Päper <christoph.pae...@crissov.de > wrote: > Mark Davis ☕️ <m...@macchiato.com>: > > > > In order to understand the status of any document in the registry, you > need to also look at the minutes of the meeting where they are discussed, > > I’ve said it before: Unicode is lacking a proper public issue tracker. > > >
