> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:25:53 +0100 (BST) > From: William_J_G Overington <[email protected]> > > [email protected] wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 15 2016 at 21:27 CEST, [email protected] writes: > > [...] > > >> Isn't "grapheme cluster" the definition you are looking for? > > > I don't think so. > > Is an example of a textel that would definitely not be a grapheme cluster be > when a character is expressed as a BASE CHARACTER character followed by one > or more TAG CHARACTER characters.
Since no formal definition of a "textel" was presented, except via an example, it's not clear to me whether what you propose can be a textel. (I also don't quite understand the semantics of a base character followed by tag characters, to say the truth.)
