On 16 Nov 2016, at 01:47, Mark E. Shoulson <[email protected]> wrote: > > The defensiveness was not that Tolkienian scholarship was deemed "worthy", > but more that Klingon's apparently was not.
Back in the day? No. It wasn’t. > There was a Roadmap with pIqaD on it, and indeed you were the one who put it > there. Nick Nicholas, in > https://web.archive.org/web/20120307231609fw_/http://www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/Klingon/piqad.html > credits you with a "delightful move of defiance" for replacing pIqaD with > Sarati when it was removed. That would be me. >> The Roadmaps are really of no consequence. They’re useful, but they have no >> status and are subject to any kind of change before ballotting ends. > > Getting pIqaD off the "not-roadmapped" list is more important, both > symbolically and, as Ken Whistler says, practically. Ha’ ruch. Michael
