|
On 12/29/2016 1:20 PM, Marcel Schneider
wrote:
this Unicode recommendation leads to content corruption when the related markup is stripped off. That may occur sooner than expected, e.g. in Word (2010) when a character style is applied. The solution is to find better ways to apply character styles. For example, if a style definition is intended to ensure that something is in italics (for emphasis), then changing all formatting for the text is overkill. There may be very valid reasons to not remove super/subscript, font bindings (other than switch from regular to italic version of a font) or even text color. Finally, in changing text to an italic style, any words already in italics might be toggled rather than blindly switched - that's what human typesetters tend to do. Looking at it this way, your beef is not with character encoding, but with limitations (needlessly) imposed by software. A./
|
- Re: a character for an unknown character William_J_G Overington
- Re: a character for an unknown character Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: a character for an unknown character William_J_G Overington
- Re: a character for an unknown character Richard Wordingham
- Re: a character for an unknown character Marcel Schneider
- Re: a character for an unknown charact... Asmus Freytag
- French Superscript Abbreviations F... Marcel Schneider
- Re: French Superscript Abbrev... Asmus Freytag
- Re: French Superscript Ab... Philippe Verdy
- Re: French Superscript Ab... Marcel Schneider
- Re: French Superscript Ab... Asmus Freytag
- Re: French Superscript Ab... Marcel Schneider
- Re: French Superscript Ab... Marcel Schneider
- Re: Superscript and Subsc... Marcel Schneider
- Re: a character for an unknown cha... Richard Wordingham
- Re: a character for an unknow... Asmus Freytag
- Re: a character for an un... Marcel Schneider
- Re: a character for an un... Richard Wordingham
- Re: a character for an un... Marcel Schneider
- Re: a character for an un... Richard Wordingham
- Re: a character for an un... Marcel Schneider

